Public Board of Directors papers 27.01.22

assertiveFTSU service; that theBoard has mechanisms tohear theexperienceof colleagues; that theBoard can be held to account as a f air employer through its cultureand transparent processes. The review team is not able to assess thepotential for patientsof theproposals for a commercial partnership to take f orward molecular profiling and real-world data. However, it would be most regrettable if significant developments were delayed because there were inadequate project management and governance arrangements, leading to thework being put onhold. 5. Acknowledgements The review team would like to thank all thosepeoplewho came forward and thosewho responded to invitations to attend meetings. Everyone has been very open with the views and willingness to answer questions. The majority of peoplewho met the teamwere very proud to work for TheChristieand to beassociatedwith the care provided f or its patients. Their contact with the review was largely motivated by a desire to see improvements implemented in order that TheChristie might thrive in the f uture.

18

59